Holly Briley
strikes again! The infamous cyber-stalker/bully and leaker of the Casey Anthony video diaries has once again used the name of blogger Brianne Chantal, this time in relation to her ongoing internet dispute with another blogger, William Murtaugh.
It is unknown what kickstarted Briley’s troubles with Murtaugh, but just like Chantal, Nikki of the Big Bombshell Blog and Carol Todd, mother of Amanda Todd, whom she lashed out at and accused of lying, and even Radar Online contributor Amber Goodhand, whom also found Briley to be suspicious…Mr. Murtaugh simply seems to be yet another name on the list of Holly Briley’s victims.
It was this afternoon that Briley took to her secondary blog, RadioNewz, where she not only published an article on Murtaugh, but used Brianne Chantal to push her agenda. In a section of the blog, Briley posted what appear to be comments from Chantal which suggest she does not support Murtaugh. The only problem? Chantal says the comments did not come from her. It appears as though Briley or someone simply left comments using Chantal’s name.
Forged comments by Holly Briley
If this sounds familiar to you, that’s because it is, as authorities in Canada had previously accused Briley of Uttering Forged Documents (a criminal offense) when she published a “text message” as well as a “Facebook message” on her website claiming to have been from Brianne, only later to have been deemed fake by authorities, but also by Briley, herself, after she later admitted it was a fake. After being told to remove the text messages and other things pertaining to Chantal and the authorities, it was then that Briley filed a complaint against the officer, which is almost laughable in and of itself. Guess she doesn’t like it when she’s called out on her shit!
Briley also claims to have been in touch with Rogers, Chantal’s service provider. However, after reaching out to one of our own contacts at Rogers today, we have been told that there has been no interaction based on Chantal’s account since April 24th – either from Brianne, herself, or other individuals. While Briley may have attempted to make contact with the company, all attempts by her at contacting Rogers in relation to Brianne have gone no where, as they found no evidence of Holly’s claims. It would appear as though Holly’s latest claim of being in touch with the company and having an “interesting online chat” is nothing more than Holly’s attempt at inciting drama.
So what does Chantal think of the latest round of drama? “I’ve gotten used to it,” she says. Adding, “At this point I’m numb to it all. It’s just ridiculous that she continues to do what she’s doing. Just when you think she has stopped, she starts up again. It’s never-ending. But what can you do? You can either dwell on it and let it consume you, or take the negative and turn it into positive.”
Personally, we feel Briley needs the internet taken away from her. She has lied about authorities, lied about individuals she has never even met, forged documents… What next? It appears that Briley will go to any length to harm the reputations of others except it seems as though people are slowly but surely beginning to see through all of Holly’s lies.
Now, we already know what Briley may or may not say in regards to these latest faked comments – that they’re not fake, that IP’s match and that she has “proof.” Well, proof can be easily altered and things can easily be photoshopped, as Briley, herself, has already proven, so consider the source and take what Holly Briley says with a grain of salt.
At the rate things are going, we may need to dedicate a separate section of this blog to Holly Briley and her antics – or better yet, an entirely separate blog all together, as we’ve received several complaints over the fact that our celebrity news coverage has been sidelined by Mrs. Briley and her online behaviors. That being said, news is news, and given that Briley inserted herself in the news a few short years ago with the whole Casey Anthony video debacle, that makes her a “newsworthy” person whether one likes it or not, therefore we report it!
A more in-depth account of this matter can be read about at http://www.briannechantal.com and http://murtwitnessonelive.wordpress.com/
UPDATE: Just as we predicted, Holly Briley’s big boss over at RadioNewz has posted an update in response to this matter and, yes, has PHOTOSHOPPED the IP address into a “screen shot.” As we stated previously, screen shots are EASILY altered and given that these individuals have ADMITTEDLY altered “proof” before, it is what they have also done in this matter.
Just as an example, below we have provided you with what a real screen shot from WordPress looks like, unlike the one they have posted over on RadioNewz.
REAL comment from WordPress
Now, just for comparison, here is an example of an EASILY ALTERED comment.
ALTERED comment
And here is a screen shot in which Holly Briley admits she faked.
Furthermore, Holly Briley is claiming the IP address from “Brianne” came from Rogers Cable and her cohort, “Radio,” is claiming it is a proxy. Rogers operates wireless (cell phone) services, cable (television) services and home phone services. You could not have the same IP address for all services. But herein lies the problem: Rogers CABLE is not even available in the Province of British Columbia. We contacted Rogers just to confirm this information – below is a screen shot of our chat transcript with the company. Interesting, to say the least!
Our little chat with Rogers proves that:
1. Cable/internet services from Rogers are NOT available in British Columbia
2. There is absolutely no way anyone IN British Columbia could use a Rogers IP as a proxy
It is quite evident that whomever made the two comments on the blog, it was not Brianne, but someone attempting to make it appear to be her.
